Advertisement

The Application of Machine Learning to Quality Improvement Through the Lens of the Radiology Value Network

      Abstract

      Recent advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence offer promising applications to radiology quality improvement initiatives as they relate to the radiology value network. Coordination within the interlocking web of systems, events, and stakeholders in the radiology value network may be mitigated though standardization, automation, and a focus on workflow efficiency. In this article the authors present applications of these various strategies via use cases for quality improvement projects at different points in the radiology value network. In addition, the authors discuss opportunities for machine-learning applications in data aggregation as opposed to traditional applications in data extraction.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      ACR Member Login
      ACR Members, access to JACR is a member benefit. Use your ACR credentials to access all JACR articles and features.
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Purchase one-time access:

      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Porter M.
        Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance.
        Free Press, New York1985
        • Larson D.B.
        • Froehle C.M.
        • Johnson N.D.
        • Towbin A.J.
        Communication in diagnostic radiology: meeting the challenges of complexity.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 957-964
        • Towbin A.J.
        • Perry L.A.
        • Larson D.B.
        Improving efficiency in the radiology department.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 47: 783-792
        • Fitzgerald R.
        Error in radiology.
        Clin Radiol. 2001; 56: 938-946
        • Gandhi T.K.
        Fumbled handoffs: one dropped ball after another.
        Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142: 352-358
        • Whang J.S.
        • Baker S.R.
        • Patel R.
        • Luk L.
        • Castro III, A.
        The causes of medical malpractice suits against radiologists in the United States.
        Radiology. 2013; 266: 548-554
        • Wang S.
        • Summers R.M.
        Machine learning and radiology.
        Med Image Anal. 2012; 16: 933-951
        • Demner-Fushman D.
        • Chapman W.W.
        • McDonald C.J.
        What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support?.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 760-772
        • Reiner B.
        Uncovering and improving upon the inherent deficiencies of radiology reporting through data mining.
        J Digit Imaging. 2010; 23: 109-118
        • Lakhani P.
        • Sundaram B.
        Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks.
        Radiology. 2017; 284: 574-582
        • Spampinato C.
        • Palazzo S.
        • Giordano D.
        • Aldinucci M.
        • Leonardi R.
        Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images.
        Med Image Anal. 2017; 36: 41-51
        • Prasoon A.
        • Petersen K.
        • Igel C.
        • Lauze F.
        • Dam E.
        • Nielsen M.
        Deep feature learning for knee cartilage segmentation using a triplanar convolutional neural network.
        Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013; 16: 246-253
        • Krizhevsky A.
        • SI
        • Hinton G.E.
        ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.
        Adv Neural Inform Process Syst. 2012; : 1097-1105
      1. Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC).
        (Available at:)
        http://www.image-net.org/challenges/LSVRC/
        Date accessed: January 28, 2019
        • Szegedy C.
        • Ioffe S.
        • Vanhoucke V.
        • Alemi A.A.
        Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning. arXiv.
        (Available at:)
        https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07261
        Date accessed: June 6, 2019
        • Annarumma M.
        • Withey S.J.
        • Bakewell R.J.
        • Pesce E.
        • Goh V.
        • Montana G.
        Automated triaging of adult chest radiographs with deep artificial neural networks.
        Radiology. 2019; 291: 272
        • Li Y.
        • Wu F.X.
        • Ngom A.
        A review on machine learning principles for multi-view biological data integration.
        Brief Bioinform. 2018; 19: 325-340
        • Bal M.
        • Amasyali M.F.
        • Sever H.
        • Kose G.
        • Demirhan A.
        Performance evaluation of the machine learning algorithms used in inference mechanism of a medical decision support system.
        Sci World J. 2014; 2014: 137896
        • Yan H.
        • JY
        • Zheng J.
        • Peng C.
        • Li Q.
        A multilayer perceptron-based medical decision support system for heart disease diagnosis.
        Expert Syst Appl. 2006; 30: 272-281
        • Bennett C.C.
        • Hauser K.
        Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: a Markov decision process approach.
        Artif Intel Med. 2013; 57: 9-19
        • Kurasawa H.
        • Hayashi K.
        • Fujino A.
        • et al.
        Machine-learning-based prediction of a missed scheduled clinical appointment by patients with diabetes.
        J Diabetes Sci Tech. 2016; 10: 730-736
        • Glover M.T.
        • Daye D.
        • Khalilzadeh O.
        • et al.
        Socioeconomic and demographic predictors of missed opportunities to provide advanced imaging services.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1403-1411
        • Harvey H.B.
        • Liu C.
        • Ai J.
        • et al.
        Predicting no-shows in radiology using regression modeling of data available in the electronic medical record.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1303-1309
      2. US Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998.

        • Yi P.H.
        • Golden S.K.
        • Harringa J.B.
        • Kliewer M.A.
        Readability of lumbar spine MRI reports: will patients understand?.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 212: 602-606
        • Martin-Carreras T.
        • Cook T.S.
        • Kahn Jr., C.E.
        Readability of radiology reports: implications for patient-centered care.
        Clin Imaging. 2018; 54: 116-120
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Scientific and Technical Information Simply Put.
        (Available at:)
        • Kruse C.S.
        • Bolton K.
        • Freriks G.
        The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.
        J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17: e44
        • Hansberry D.R.
        • John A.
        • John E.
        • Agarwal N.
        • Gonzales S.F.
        • Baker S.R.
        A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.org.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 566-575
        • Cook T.S.
        • Oh S.C.
        • Kahn Jr., C.E.
        Patients’ use and evaluation of an online system to annotate radiology reports with lay language definitions.
        Acad Radiol. 2017; 24: 1169-1174
        • Oh S.C.
        • Cook T.S.
        • Kahn Jr., C.E.
        PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting.
        J Digit Imaging. 2016; 29: 450-454
        • Rooney S.P.
        • Hoffman S.
        • Perrin J.C.
        • Milliron K.J.
        • Nees A.V.
        • Jorns J.M.
        Patient-friendly pathology reports for patients with breast atypias.
        Breast J. 2018; 24: 855-857