« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 2
, Pages 109-114
, February 2010
The ACR Guideline on Communication: To Be or Not to Be, That Is the Question
References
- . Never having a never event. http://www.hospitalimpact.org/index.php/2009/04/01/never_having_a_never_eventAccessed December 7, 2009
- . Facts about the National Patient Safety Goals. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/npsg_facts.htmAccessed December 7, 2009
- Improving handoff communications: meeting National Patient Safety Goal 2E. Jt Comm Pers Patient Safety. 2006;6:9–15
- . National Patient Safety Goal compliance trends by program: 2008 Hospital Accreditation Program (January 1 – December 31, 2008). http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/184406E5-0646-4D5A-A844-3DE467309F39/0/Hospitalprogram2008.pdfAccessed December 7, 2009
- . National Patient Safety Goal compliance trends by program: 2008 Ambulatory Care Accreditation Program (January 1 – December 31, 2008). http://www.jointcommission.org/NR/rdonlyres/4E983814-ED82-434F-B8E7-CEFB936A7BB4/0/Ambulatoryprogram2008.pdfAccessed December 7, 2009
- . Improving America's hospitals: the Joint Commission's annual report on quality and safety, 2008. http://www.jointcommissionreport.org/pdf/JC_2008_Annual_Report-updated.pdfAccessed December 7, 2009
- Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–128
- . Reducing physician liability with tracking and follow-up systems. http://www.apassurance.com/RiskMgt/Articles_RM/Tracking_FollowUp_Systems_42005.pdfAccessed December 7, 2009
- Physician Insurers Association of America. Risk management review, exhibit 9, radiology, 2009 edition. Rockville, Md: Physician Insurers Association of America.
- . ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. (revised 2005) http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories%2fquality_safety%2fguidelines%2fdx%2fcomm_diag_rad.aspxAccessed December 7, 2009
- Phillips v Good Samaritan Hospital, 416 NE 2D 646 (Ohio App 1979).
- Merriman v Toothaker, 515 P 2D 509 (Wash App 1973).
- Jenoff v Gleason, 521 A 2D 1323 (NJ App 1987).
- Courteau v Dodd, 773 SW 2D 436 (Ark 1989).
- Daly v United States, 946 F 2D 1467 (9th Cir 1991).
- . Writing, signing, and reading the radiology report: who is responsible and when?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:246–247
- . Reply. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:247–248
- . Communication, the deep pocket, and ACR standards. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:248
- . Reply. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:249
- Stanley v McCarver, 92 P 2D 849 (Ariz 2004).
- Stanley v McCarver, 63 P 3D 1076 (Ariz App 2003).
- Reed v Bojarski, 764 A 2D 433 (NJ 2001).
- Diaz v New York Downtown Hospital, 784 NE 2D 68 (NY 2002).
- . Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR Guideline. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:15–21
- . Radiology critical diagnostic imaging findings. http://www.thedoctors.com/KnowledgeCenter/PatientSafety/articles/CON_ID_001629Accessed December 7, 2009
- . Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;23:489–494
- . Efficiency of a semiautomated coding and review process for notification of critical findings in diagnostic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:933–936
- . Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:459–466
- . Communicating results of all outpatient radiologic examinations directly to patients: the times has come. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:571–573
PII: S1546-1440(09)00586-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.007
© 2010 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 2
, Pages 109-114
, February 2010
