Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 2 , Pages 154-157 , February 2010

Advances in Computed Radiography: Dual-Side Readout

  • J. Anthony Seibert, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationJ. Anthony Seibert, PhD, Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817

References 

  1. Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengylics SM. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:1132–1141
  2. Seibert JA, Shelton DK, Moore EH. Computed radiography x-ray exposure trends. Acad Radiol. 1996;3:313–318
  3. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–1783
  4. Fetterly KA, Schueler BA. Performance evaluation of a “dual-side read” dedicated mammography computed radiography system. Med Phys. 2003;30:1843–1854
  5. Seibert JA, Boone JM, Cooper VN, Lindfors KK. Cassette-based digital mammography. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3:413–427
  6. Fetterley KA, Schueler BA. Performance evaluation of a CR imaging device using a typical “front-side” and novel “dual-side” readout storage phosphor. Med Phys. 2006;33:290–296
  7. Monnin P, Holzer Z, Wolf R, et al. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology. Med Phys. 2006;33:411–420
  8. Riccardi L, Cauzzo MC, Fabbris R, et al. Comparison between built-in “dual-side” chest imaging device with a standard “single side” CR. Med Phys. 2007;34:119–126

PII: S1546-1440(09)00581-X

doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.002

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 2 , Pages 154-157 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution