Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 6, Issue 6 , Pages 442-447, June 2009

Using QRRO Survey Data to Assess Compliance With Quality Indicators for Breast and Prostate Cancer

  • Jean B. Owen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Quality Research in Radiation Oncology, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Jean B. Owen, PhD, American College of Radiology, 1818 Market Street, Suite 1600, Philadelphia, PA 19103
  • ,
  • Julia R. White, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Michael J. Zelefsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • ,
  • J. Frank Wilson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Purpose

Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) has embarked on a new national process survey to provide benchmark data that will allow radiation oncologists to assess the quality of care in their own practices by measuring quality indicators (QIs) and comparing individual with national practice.

Methods

Investigators at QRRO developed QIs on the basis of nationally recognized, evidence-based guidelines such as those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, as well as additional emerging QIs for processes involving rapidly emerging technology. They specifically defined the QIs as clinical performance measures. Published results of the national survey database for patients treated in 1998 and 1999 were reviewed and additional analyses conducted to assess data adequacy to measure compliance with these clinical performance measures.

Results

Examples of workup QIs for breast cancer patients showed that 97% underwent diagnostic bilateral mammography, 96% underwent pathology reviews, 83% underwent the determination of estrogen receptor status, 81% underwent the determination of progesterone receptor status, and 31% underwent the determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status. Compliance with treatment QIs for field recommendations on the basis of nodal findings can be measured. Of patients with prostate cancer, 90% underwent digital rectal examinations, 99% underwent prostate-specific antigen tests, and 99% had their Gleason scores determined. Compliance with QIs on the basis of prognostic group can also be measured.

Conclusions

Benchmarking utilization patterns provides a foundation for assessing the appropriateness of cancer care in the future. The QRRO database is a rich data source, and the new survey will provide contemporary benchmark data for these measures.

Key Words: Quality indicators, radiation oncology practice, quality of care, oncology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by grant CA 065435 from the National Cancer Institute and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, Tobacco Settlement Act 77-2001, Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement for State Fiscal Year 2005.

PII: S1546-1440(08)00563-2

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2008.11.008

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 6, Issue 6 , Pages 442-447, June 2009