Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 6 , Pages 772-774 , June 2008

Can Metrics Obtained From Your IT Databases Help Start Your Practice Dashboard?

  • Ramin Khorasani, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationRamin Khorasani, MD, MPH, Department of Radiology and Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115

References 

  1. Hillman BJ, Amis ES, Neiman HL. The future quality and safety of medical imaging: proceedings of the third annual ACR FORUM. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:33–39
  2. Sistrom CL. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria: translation to practice and research. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005;2:61–67
  3. Blackmore CC, Medina LS. Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3:505–509
  4. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C, et al. Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:261–266
  5. Borgstede JP, Lewis RS, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:59–65
  6. Ruchman RB, Jaeger J, Wiggins EF, et al. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:523–526

PII: S1546-1440(08)00154-3

doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.03.003

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 6 , Pages 772-774 , June 2008

Article Tools