Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 8 , Pages 907-918.e8, August 2008

Radiologists' Clinical Practice of Neuroimaging

  • Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.
    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA 20191
  • ,
  • Leonard Merewitz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • LAMA Consulting, Chevy Chase, Maryland.
  • ,
  • Rebecca S. Lewis, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.

Purpose

Because of the importance of neuroimaging as a radiology subspecialty, the aim of this study was to provide a detailed portrait of the demographics, clinical activities, and practices of radiologists heavily involved in neuroimaging.

Methods

The authors analyzed data from the ACR's 2003 Survey of Radiologists, a large, stratified random-sample survey in which respondents were guaranteed confidentiality. The survey achieved a 63% response rate, and responses were weighted to make them representative of all radiologists in the United States.

Results

Three-fourths of US radiologists reported doing neuroradiology; 9% reported that neuroradiology was their main subspecialty, and 9% reported spending more than 50% of their clinical work time doing neuroradiology. Of these latter two categories, more than about 75% had certificates of added qualification (CAQs) in neuroradiology, and more than 80% had done neuroradiology fellowships. However, of those spending more than 50% of their clinical work time doing neuroradiology, 7% neither had CAQs nor had done fellowships in the field. One-fourth of radiologists with CAQs or who had done neuroradiology fellowships spent less than 30% of their clinical work time doing neuroradiology. One-third to one-half of neuroimaging was performed by radiologists not heavily involved in the field. Only 6% to 8% of radiologists heavily involved in the field were women, compared with 22% in other subspecialties.

Conclusions

Neuroimaging has the great strength of being a relatively well-integrated subspecialty in that a very large majority of those heavily involved in its practice have CAQs and did fellowships in the field. Among possible concerns are the relatively few women in the field and the apparent waste of expertise resulting from one-fourth of those with neuroradiology subspecialty training or certification being relatively little immersed in its practice.

Key Words: radiology practice, neuroradiologists, subspecialization, neuroimaging, neuroradiology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1546-1440(08)00118-X

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2008.02.021

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 8 , Pages 907-918.e8, August 2008