Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 585-592, April 2008

Results of a Survey on Digital Screening Mammography: Prevalence, Efficiency, and Use of Ancillary Diagnostic Aids

  • Tamara Miner Haygood, PhD, MD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Tamara Miner Haygood, PhD, MD, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 1273, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009
  • ,
  • Gary J. Whitman, MD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • ,
  • E. Neely Atkinson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • ,
  • Rumiana G. Nikolova, MS

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • ,
  • Sheisa Y. Claudio Sandoval

      Affiliations

    • Carolina, Puerto Rico.
  • ,
  • Peter J. Dempsey, MD

      Affiliations

    • The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Objective

As the use of full-field digital screening mammography grows rapidly, this study was conducted to determine the time required to interpret digital soft-copy (filmless) mammography compared with conventional film-screen screening mammography and to evaluate radiologists’ use of ancillary diagnostic aids when interpreting digital mammography (DM) and conventional film-screen mammography (FSM).

Materials and Methods

An 18-question survey was sent to 1,703 members of the Society of Breast Imaging, whose e-mail addresses were provided by the society. After subtracting those from whom out-of-office e-mail responses were received and three who wrote back to exclude themselves, there were 1,659 potential participants. Data from the respondents were collected and analyzed by tabulation and cross-tabulation.

Results

In total, 396 members of the Society of Breast Imaging completed and returned surveys, for a 23.9% response rate. Of the respondents, 49.0% said that they had access to and interpreted DM. Their estimated average time to read a single digital mammographic study was 2.6 minutes, compared with 2.0 minutes for reading a single film-screen mammographic study. Therefore, the perceived time difference was 0.6 minutes. Magnification was the main ancillary diagnostic aid used in interpreting both DM and FSM: 74.2% of respondents used computer-based magnification at least half the time in interpreting DM, and 90.9% used optical magnification at least half the time in interpreting FSM. Optical magnification was also used by 28.5% of respondents at least half the time in interpreting DM. The respondents also used computer-aided detection frequently: 91.0% and 76.3% of those who had computer-aided detection available said that they used it at least 75% of the time in interpreting DM and FSM, respectively.

Conclusion

Digital mammography takes longer to interpret than FSM. Radiologists use various ancillary diagnostic aids, but magnification and computer-aided detection are the two most commonly used aids.

Key Words: Screening mammography, CAD, digital mammography, digital imaging, efficiency

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1546-1440(07)00641-2

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.10.019

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 585-592, April 2008