Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 4, Issue 10 , Pages 686-690, October 2007

Update on the Diagnostic Radiology Employment Market: Findings Through 2006-2007

  • Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD

      Affiliations

    • American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.
    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA, 20191
  • ,
  • C. Douglas Maynard, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Purpose

To describe the employment market for diagnostic radiologists in 2006-2007, with attention to differences among subspecialties.

Methods

The authors conducted the most recent in a series of annual surveys of vacancies in academic departments and obtained data from the placement service of the American College of Radiology (ACR), its Professional Bureau, during its operation at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. The two data series were correlated. The percentage of academic vacancies in each subspecialty was compared with the percentage of academic radiologists in that subspecialty.

Results

Job listings per job seeker at the placement service, which serves both community and academic positions, were 0.72 for 2007 compared with approximately 1.1 to 1.2 for 2003 to 2006 and variation from 0.25 to 3.8 in the preceding decade. The correlation of the two data series was 0.84 (P = .08) for the 5 years for which both are available. Particularly high ratios of academic vacancies to academic radiologists were found for interventional radiology and breast imaging; particularly low ratios were found for neuroradiology and nuclear radiology.

Conclusions

The job market remains very much intermediate between the highs and lows that have occurred since 1990, but finding highly desirable jobs is likely to be somewhat more difficult, and filling vacancies somewhat easier, in 2007 than in the past few years. Interventional radiology and breast imaging are the subspecialties in which academic positions are most difficult to fill; neuroradiology and nuclear radiology seem to be at the opposite end of the spectrum. The same differences across subspecialties are probably found in community practice, given the strong correlation of the two data series.

Key Words: Employment of radiologists, radiologist surplus and shortage, academic radiology, radiology practice, socioeconomics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1546-1440(07)00340-7

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.06.015

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 4, Issue 10 , Pages 686-690, October 2007