Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 40-44 , January 2007

Radiation Oncology Physicists Will Need to Better Understand Medical Imaging

  • X. Allen Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: X. Allen Li, PhD, Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Radiation Oncology, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
  • ,
  • William R. Hendee, PhD

References 

  1. Apisarnthanarax S, Chao KS. Current imaging paradigms in radiation oncology. Radiat Res. 2005;163:1–25
  2. Ling CC, Humm J, Larson S, et al. Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:551–560
  3. Mackie TR, Kapatoes J, Ruchala K, et al. Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:89–105
  4. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, et al. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:1337–1349
  5. Pouliot J, Bani-Hashemi A, Chen J, et al. Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:552–560
  6. Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, et al. AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66 Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. Med Phys. 2003;30:2762–2792
  7. Keall P. 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14:81–90
  8. Harvey C, Dooher A, Morgan J, et al. Imaging of tumour therapy responses by dynamic CT. Eur J Radiol. 1999;30:221–226
  9. Hermans R, Meijerink M, Van den Bogaert W, et al. Tumor perfusion rate determined noninvasively by dynamic computed tomography predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:1351–1356
  10. Haider MA, Milosevic M, Fyles A, et al. Assessment of the tumor microenvironment in cervix cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced CT, interstitial fluid pressure and oxygen measurements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1100–1107
  11. Ulmer JL, Salvan CV, Mueller WM, et al. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in establishing the proximity of tumor borders to functional brain systems: implications for preoperative risk assessments and postoperative outcomes. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004;3:567–576
  12. Yetkin FZ, Mendelsohn D. Hypoxia imaging in brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002;12:537–552
  13. Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Karczmar GS, et al. MRI of the tumor microenvironment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:430–450
  14. Schmainda KM, Rand SD, Joseph AM, et al. Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:1524–1532
  15. Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, et al. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:451–463
  16. Nelson SJ, Graves E, Pirzkall A, et al. In vivo molecular imaging for planning radiation therapy of gliomas: an application of 1H MRSI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:464–476
  17. Delbeke D, Martin WH. Metabolic imaging with FDG: a primer. Cancer J. 2004;10:201–213
  18. Bujenovic S. The role of positron emission tomography in radiation treatment planning. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:293–299
  19. Schoder H, Larson SM. Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 2004;34:274–292
  20. Rosenzweig KE, Amols H, Ling CC. New radiotherapy technologies. Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21:190–195
  21. Perez CA, Bradley J, Chao CK, et al. Functional imaging in treatment planning in radiation therapy: a review. Rays. 2002;27:157–173
  22. Brahme A. Biologically optimized 3-dimensional in vivo predictive assay-based radiation therapy using positron emission tomography-computerized tomography imaging. Acta Oncol. 2003;42:123–136
  23. Ferrara KW, Merritt CR, Burns PN, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:824–839
  24. Cosgrove D. Angiogenesis imaging—ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(spec no 1):S43–S49
  25. Foster FS, Burns PN, Simpson DH, et al. Ultrasound for the visualization and quantification of tumor microcirculation. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2000;19:131–138
  26. Hendee WR. Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop II: a summary of findings and recommendations. Med Phys. 2005;32:2484–2486
  27. Hendee WR, Gazelle GS. Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop III: a white paper. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:188–198
  28. Wang D, Schultz CJ, Jursinic PA, et al. Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:143–151

PII: S1546-1440(06)00334-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.004

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 40-44 , January 2007