Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 135-141 , February 2006

Medical Directors of Breast Imaging Centers: Beyond Films

  • Jay Parikh, MD

      Affiliations

    • Women’s Diagnostic Imaging Center
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprint: Jay R. Parikh, MD, Women’s Diagnostic Imaging Center, Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison Street, Arnold Pavilion, Suite 520, Seattle, WA 98104
    • ,
  • Albert Einstein Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Wash.

References 

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration . Quality mammography standards; final rule . Fed Reg . 1997;62(2088):
  2. Kan L , Olivotto IA , Sickles EA , et al.   A standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratio to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program . Radiology . 2000;215:563–567
  3. Esserman L , Cowley H , Eberle C , et al.   Improving the accuracy of mammography (volume and outcome relationships) . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2002;94(5):369–375
  4. Elmore JG , Carney PA . Does practice make perfect when interpreting mammography? . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2002;94:321–323
  5. Beam CA , Conant EF , Sickles EA . Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammography interpretation . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2003;95:282–290
  6. Lee CZ . Oncopolitical issues (Obstacles and options for success in a comprehensive breast center) . Surg Oncol Clin North Am . 2000;9(2):279–294
  7. Link JS . History and overview of comprehensive interdisciplinary breast centers . Surg Oncol Clin North Am . 2000;9(2):147–158
  8. Roux S , Logan-Young W . Private practice interdisciplinary breast centers—their rationale and impact on patients, and the health care industry (a bicoastal perspective) . Surg Oncol Clin North Am . 2000;9(2):177–198
  9. Feig SA . Adverse effects of screening mammography . Radiol Clin North Am . 2004;42(5):807–819
  10. Brett J , Austoker J . Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening (psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance) . J Pub Health Med . 2001;23:292–300
  11. Barton MB , Morley DS , Moore S , et al.   Decreasing women’s anxieties after abnormal mammograms (a controlled trial) . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2004;96(7):529–538
  12. Parikh JR , Cardenosa G , Coll D , Chadha D , Chilcote WA . Breast ultrasound . In:  Taveras JM ,  Ferrucci JT editor. Radiology . Philadelphia, Pa: J. B. Lippincott; 1999;p. 92
  13. Parikh JR , Porter B . Understanding breast ultrasound . Decis Imaging Econ . 2002;15(3):16–32
  14. Spratt J , Spratt S . Legal perspectives on mammography and self-referral . Cancer . 1992;69(2):599–600
  15. Monsees B , Destouet JM , Evens RG . The self-referred mammography patient (a new responsibility for radiologists) . Radiology . 1988;166(1):69–70
  16. Suter LG , Elmore JG . Self-referral for screening mammography . J Gen Intern Med . 1998;13(10):710–713
  17. Parikh JR, Tickman R. Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology. Breast J. In press.
  18. Liberman L . Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy . Radiol Clin North Am . 2000;38:791–807
  19. Berg WA . Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions . Radiol Clin North Am . 2004;42(5):935–946
  20. Reynolds HE . Core needle biopsy of challenging benign breast conditions (a comprehensive literature review) . Am J Roentgenol . 2000;174:1245–1250
  21. D’Orsi CJ . Mammography (will adequate manpower exist?) . Radiol Clin North Am . 2004;42:975–978
  22. Weber DO . Golden rule and R-E-S-P-E-C-T encourage employee loyalty . Physician Exec . 2003;29(4):6–11
  23. Lambert MJ . Recruiting and retaining employees (critical issues for organizational leaders) . Physician Exec . 2003;29(4):18–19
  24. O’Connor EJ , Fiol CM . Putting your money where your people are (Investing in enduring success) . Physician Exec . 2003;29(4):12–15
  25. O’Connor EJ , Annison MH . Building trust and collaboration between physicians and administrators . Physician Exec . 2002;28(2):48–52
  26. Reichheld F , Teal T . The loyalty effect . Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 1996;
  27. Kennedy MM . What do you owe your team? Survival tips for people who dread teamwork . Physician Exec . 2001;27(4):58–60
  28. Hudak RP , Brooke PP , Finstuen K , et al.   Physician executives share insights on ways to influence people—part II . Physician Exec . 2002;28(5):32–36
  29. Thompson DW . Lack of control (the physician executive’s fear) . Physician Exec . 2005;31(1):34–37
  30. Coleman C . Building quality into comprehensive breast care (a practical approach) . Surg Oncol Clin North Am . 2000;9(2):319–338
  31. DeShazo CV . Hold or fold? . Physician Exec . 2000;26(4):38–43
  32. Reece RL . Physician anger—part 1. Changing perception: an interview with Charles E Dwyer, PhD . Physician Exec . 1999;25(2):51–55
  33. Siders CT , Aschenbrenner CA . Conflict management, part 1. Conflict management checklist: a diagnostic tool for assessing conflict in organizations . Physician Exec . 1999;25(4):32–37
  34. Andrew LB . Conflict management, prevention, and resolution in medical settings . Physician Exec . 1999;25(4):38–42
  35. Sotile WM , Sotile MO . How to shape positive relationships in medical practices and hospitals . Physician Exec . 1999;25(4):57–61
  36. Aschenbrenner CA , Siders CT . Conflict management, part 2. Managing low-to-mid intensity conflict in the health care setting . Physician Exec . 1999;25(5):44–50
  37. D’Orsi CJ , Bassett LW , Berg WA , et al.   In: American College of Radiology (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)) . 4th ed.. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2003;
  38. Linver MN . Clinical performance in screening mammography; how we improve our expertise . Semin Breast Dis . 2003;6(3):128–132
  39. Parikh JR , Coleman C . Building a better breast program . Decis Imaging Econ . 2002;15(11):60–113
  40. Bassett LW , Hendrick RE , Bassford TL , et al.   Quality determinants of mammography . Rockville (Md): Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research, Public Human Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994; Clinical practice guideline #13. AHPR publication no. 95-0632.
  41. Kerlikowske K , Grady D , Barclay J , et al.   Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography . JAMA . 1996;276:33–38
  42. Fajardo LL , Hillman BJ , Frey C . Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographers’ certainty of diagnosis . Invest Radiol . 1988;23:505–508
  43. Laya MB , Gallagher JC , Schreiman JS , et al.   Effect of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern . Radiology . 1995;196:433–437
  44. Christiansen CL , Wang F , Baton MB , et al.   Predicting the risk of false-positive mammograms . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2000;92:1657–1666
  45. Laya MB , Larson EB , Taplin SH , et al.   Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography . J Natl Cancer Inst . 1996;88:643–649
  46. Vyborny CJ , Haus AG . Signal detection, image quality, and radiation dose in mammography . Semin Breast Dis . 2003;6(2):58–66
  47. Feig SA . The effect of mammographic image quality on cancer detection . Semin Breast Dis . 2003;6(2):67–71
  48. Taplin SH , Rutter CM , Finder C . Screening mammography (clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer) . at ?? al. Am J Roentgenol . 2002;178:797–804
  49. Hendrick RE , Bassett L , Botsco MA , et al.   ACR mammography quality control manual . Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 1999;
  50. Kolb GR . Disease management is the future; breast cancer is the model . Surg Oncol Clin North Am . 2000;2(9):217–232
  51. Zismer DK , Flygenring B , Campion B . Physician-led (good idea or not?) . Physician Exec . 2002;28(5):20–23
  52. Linver MN . Coding and billing of breast imaging procedures . Semin Breast Dis . 2001;4(2):78–87
  53. Kolb GR . What to do when they will not pay (strategies for increasing reimbursement at the local level) . Semin Breast Dis . 2001;4(2):88–93
  54. Parikh J , Fanus D . Implementing digital quality control in a breast center . J Am Coll Radiol . 2004;1:854–860
  55. Tenery RM . Interactions between physicians and the health care technology industry . JAMA . 2000;283(3):391–393
  56. Morin K , Rakatansky H , Riddick FA , et al.   Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials . JAMA . 2002;287(1):78–84
  57. Logan-Young W , Taylor AS , Wade T , et al.   Stand-alone breast clinics (can they survive economically?) . Semin Breast Dis . 2001;4(1):15–20
  58. Destouet JM , Sherman ML . The impact of mammography regulations on breast imaging practice costs . Semin Breast Dis . 2001;4(1):10–14
  59. Thorwarth WT , Borgstede JP . Mammography reimbursement (components and strategies for change) . Semin Breast Disease . 2001;4(2):46–53
  60. Alford J . Philanthropy (a capital idea) . Contemp Longterm Care . 2004;38–39 September
  61. Aberle DR , Chiles C , Gatsonis C , et al.   Imaging and cancer (research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network) . Radiology . 2005;235:741–751
  62. Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ, et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology. In press.

PII: S1546-1440(05)00312-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.002

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 135-141 , February 2006

Article Tools