Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 192-197, March 2010

Analysis of Appropriateness of Outpatient CT and MRI Referred From Primary Care Clinics at an Academic Medical Center: How Critical Is the Need for Improved Decision Support?

  • Bruce E. Lehnert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Robert L. Bree, MD, MHSA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
    • HealthHelp, Inc, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Robert L. Bree, MD, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359728, Seattle, WA 98104-2499

Purpose

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze a large group of CT and MRI examinations for appropriateness using evidence-based guidelines.

Methods

The authors reviewed medical records from 459 elective outpatient CT and MR examinations from primary care physicians. Evidence-based appropriateness criteria from a radiology benefit management company were used to determine if the examination would have met criteria for approval. Submitted clinical history at the time of interpretation and clinic notes and laboratory results preceding the date of the imaging study were examined to simulate a real-time consultation with the referring provider. The radiology reports and subsequent clinic visits were analyzed for outcomes.

Results

Of the 459 examinations reviewed, 284 (62%) were CT and 175 (38%) were MRI. Three hundred forty-one (74%) were considered appropriate, and 118 (26%) were not considered appropriate. Examples of inappropriate examinations included brain CT for chronic headache, lumbar spine MR for acute back pain, knee or shoulder MRI in patients with osteoarthritis, and CT for hematuria during a urinary tract infection. Fifty-eight percent of the appropriate studies had positive results and affected subsequent management, whereas only 24% of inappropriate studies had positive results and affected management.

Conclusion

A high percentage of examinations not meeting appropriateness criteria and subsequently yielding negative results suggests a need for tools to help primary care physicians improve the quality of their imaging decision requests. In the current environment, which stresses cost containment and comparative effectiveness, traditional radiology benefit management tools are being challenged by clinical decision support, with an emphasis on provider education coupled with electronic order entry systems.

Key Words: Appropriateness criteria, utilization management, evidence-based guidelines, clinical decision support, radiology benefit management, primary care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, Radiology Health Services Research, Seed Grant Program.

PII: S1546-1440(09)00589-4

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.010

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Journal of the American College of Radiology June 2010 (Vol. 7, Issue 6, Page 466)

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 192-197, March 2010